GENDER AND POLITENESS IN AN ESL LANGUAGE ACADEMIC CONTEXT Research Paper - 1

GENDER AND POLITENESS IN AN ESL LANGUAGE ACADEMIC CONTEXT - Research Paper recitationThere are several ways in which members of a particular gender express themselves politely. Globally, there are various ways of expressing oneself be it with his/her peers or the elderly, or the use jargon depending on the context, the consideration of all these elements boils down to the varied linguistic expressions of politeness by both males and females Linguistics is the study of language. talking to is the total whole of meanings and sound. It is the mode of communication surrounded by genders and thus for there to be a sense of politeness in an academic context, the following mustiness be addressed. The context of a school setting is that of a teacher, student and early(a) non teaching staff and due to the different backgrounds students have, the expression of politeness varies between the male and female students Literature review According to (Wehmeier, 2000) politeness are defined as h aving respect and good manners in consideration of the feelings of others. The conjecture of linguistic politeness by Brown and Levinson holds that the individuals face is interpreted as self get a line seen publicly. (Grundy, 2008) notes that the faces of human beings are properties comparable to self esteem. (Kitamura, 2000) notes that the face supposition is classified into two, that is the positive and the negative. On one hand, the positive face represents the similarities that exist between people interacting and appreciate each others self image while on the other hand the negative face represents the desire to be unrestricted. These theorists argue that interact ants mutually aim to maintain each others face. (Holmes, 2006) notes that ideally, one can never know what people are feeling or thinking in a conversation, thus try to control what is conveyed to them through communication For the sake of harmony in a given society, politeness strategy is essential and thus empl oyed in conversations. This is so as (Bowe & Martin, 2007) note that face can be maintained, lost, enhanced and monitored during interactions. According to (Bowe & Martin, 2009) citing Brown and Levinson, the face is threatened by inappropriate behavior or acts. (Holmes, 2006) points out that this positioning is assessed through three operational defined factors the social distance (D) between partners, the ranking of the imposition (R) shared in the word of the appropriate culture and the agency (P) of the addressee over the speaker. The seriousness of these acts therefore can be easily measured and assessed. With regard to gender, it argues that women are linguistically more polite than the men. The use of minimal responses comparable yeah and mhm demonstrates active participation, agreement and therefore used by both sexes. The use of caputs for men, normally, it is genuine while for women its more of a rhetoric question and therefore use it more for conversations sake, with regard to writing, both use it as a literacy tool. In conversation, meaning is determined by the someone listening depending on his/her concerns, focus and habits rather than the will intended for. Women seem to attach more weight to the significance of listening rather than men. The use of communicative aggressiveness is used more so by women and physical aggression is used more by men. The issue of self